• AgoraVox sur Twitter
  • RSS
  • Agoravox TV
  • Agoravox Mobile


En réponse à :


morice morice 23 mai 2010 11:21

héhé, mais en Corée du Sud aussi on reprend l’idée :


http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2010/05/205_66234.html

Questions raised about ’smoking gun’

By Jung Sung-ki
Staff reporter

Despite hard evidence provided by investigators looking into the cause of the March 26 sinking of the Cheonan, questions linger about the cause of the incident.


The CHT-02D uses acoustic/wake homing and passive acoustic tracking methods, the team said. Acoustic homing torpedoes track and target the engine noise from a ship.

But some experts raised the question if a midget submarine could have a system to carry and control such a precision-homing heavy torpedo.

``Sango class submarines are known to be used by North Korean commandos in infiltrating areas or laying mines, but they apparently do not have an advanced system to guide homing weapons,« an expert at a missile manufacturer told The Korea Times on condition of anonymity. »If a smaller class submarine was involved, there is a bigger question mark."


même plus gros, un sous marin ne peut pas guider cette torpille : alors plus petit encore...


Moon’s remarks also raised a question about the credibility of South Korean and U.S. authorities. Earlier, South Korean and U.S. military authorities confirmed several times that there had been no sign of North Korean infiltration in the West Sea.

In addition, Moon’s team reversed its position on whether or not there was a column of water following an air bubble effect.


Earlier, the team said there were no sailors who had witnessed a column of water. But during Thursday’s briefing session, the team said a soldier onshore at Baengnyeong Island witnessed « an approximately 100-meter-high pillar of white, » adding that the phenomenon was consistent with a shockwave and bubble effect. 


personne a bord n’a vu de « bulle » créée par la torpille. 

The JIG displayed fragments of a torpedo propeller during Thursday’s press conference, citing it as critical evidence. It said the torpedo parts was recovered by fishing vessels May 15, and the debris, including 5x5 bladed contra-rotating propellers, a propulsion motor and steering section, perfectly match the schematics of the CHT-02D torpedo.

But it seemed that the collected parts had been corroding at least for several months.


la corrosion est bien trop importante, comme je l’ai montré.


Investigators claim the Korean word written on the driving shaft of the propeller parts was same as that seen on a North Korean torpedo discovered by the South off the west coast seven years ago. 


ce n’est pas 7 ans mais 12 : c’est en 1998.

« The word is not inscribed on the part but written on it, » an analyst said. « I personally trust the investigators tried their best to prove the link between North Korea and the Cheonan sinking, but the lettering issue is dubious. »


deux questions demeurent donc en EVIDENCE : la corrosion des pièces, jugée trop importante pour dater de 55 jours sous l’eau, et le lettrage au feutre, visiblement ajouté....


Tous des cons, hein, Renève, jusqu’en Corée du Sud...


Ajouter une réaction

Pour réagir, identifiez-vous avec votre login / mot de passe, en haut à droite de cette page

Si vous n'avez pas de login / mot de passe, vous devez vous inscrire ici.


FAIRE UN DON


Palmarès