• AgoraVox sur Twitter
  • RSS
  • Agoravox TV
  • Agoravox Mobile


Commentaire de brieli67

sur OGM : une victoire historique


Voir l'intégralité des commentaires de cet article

brieli67 14 janvier 2010 11:28

pour Docteur RATH

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthias_Rath

Rath’s claims and methods have been widely criticized by medical organizations, AIDS-activist groups, and the United Nations, among others.[3][4][11][12] Former South African President Thabo Mbeki and former Minister of Health Manto Tshabalala-Msimang have also been criticized by the medical and AIDS-activist community for their perceived support for Rath’s claims.[11][13][14] According to doctors with Médecins Sans Frontières,[15] the Treatment Action Campaign, a South African AIDS-activist group,[16] and a former Rath colleague,[17] unauthorized clinical trials run by Rath and his associates, using vitamins as therapy for HIV, resulted in deaths of some participants. In 2008, the Cape High Court found the trials unlawful, banned Rath and his foundation from conducting unauthorized clinical trials and from advertising their products, and instructed the South African Health Department to fully investigate Rath’s vitamin trials.[16][18] In 2008, Rath expanded his advertising to Russia, a country where the incidence of HIV/AIDS has been increasing.[10]

  • In 2008, the Cape Town High Court issued an interdict barring Rath from advertising his products as a treatment for AIDS, and stating that the clinical trials he has been running in black townships are illegal. The ruling also found that "Health Minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang and her department had a duty to investigate Rath’s activities."[65]
In 2008 Ben Goldacre and The Guardian were sued for libel by Matthias Rath for the content of three articles describing Rath’s activities in South Africa.[66][67][68] In September 2008, Rath dropped his suit and was ordered to pay costs, an interim amount of about £220,000.[10] Goldacre has expressed interest in writing a « meticulously referenced » work on Rath, and South African AIDS denialism in general, based on material which had been excised from his column during the litigation.[69] A chapter of Goldacre’s Bad Science, omitted from the first edition due to the litigation, was reinstated in the paperback edition in early 2009, made available on his website, and licenced for free distribution.[1]

iL VOUS FAUT DES TRADUCTIONS ??? OU QUOI ?

Vous tombez sous la loi ! BON COURAGE

Répondre Signaler un abus

Voir ce commentaire dans son contexte


Derniers commentaires




Palmarès