Après discussion avec Manfred
Je relis le baratin du NIST qui essaye de justifier d’avoir pris les heures affichées à l’écran des grandes chaines pour l’impact sur la tour 2 (qui sert ensuite de base pour la chronologie complète)
« Many of the news broadcasts on September 11, 2001, had the current time imprinted on the screen. These imprints are known in the industry as »bugs« . As these broadcasts were timed, it became apparent that there were small differences between times for the second aircraft impact based on these bugs and the time used as the basis for the database. Checks with several broadcasters indicated that the bugs should be quite close to the actual time because the clocks used as sources for the bugs are regularly updated from highly accurate sources, such as geopositioning satellites or the precise atomic-clock-based timing signals provided by NIST as a public service. Careful checks showed small time differences between different video recordings, but these were generally less than 1 s. These small discrepancies were likely due to variations in transmission times resulting from the different pathways that the video signals took to the sites where they were recorded. Based on four independent video recordings, the actual time of the second aircraft impact was determined to be 9:02:59 a.m., or 5 s later than the time assigned in developing the database. The estimated uncertainty is 1 s. »
puis je lis
There is usually a 75-90 second delay between what is actually being filmed and what is being broadcast
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_television
Puis je constate que sur certaines chaines (Fox news, CNN) il y a des décalages de plusieurs secondes par rapport à d’autres en ce qui concerne le timing de l’impact.
Bref toutes les analyses qui se basent sur des informations chronologiques (y compris la mienne) s’effondrement immédiatement si elles ne reposent que sur cette information non complètement fiable et il me semble difficile d’argumenter maintenant qu’elle puisse l’être.
D’un autre coté ce serait une bonne nouvelle puisque ca permettrait de se recentrer sur d’autres arguments beaucoup plus simples.
Avant de virer complètement de mon site tout ce qui concerne les aspects chronologiques
de l’analyse sismique (pas grand chose car j’etais resté méfiant ) j’attends des réactions éclairées et infos pertinentes en ce qui concerne le broadcasting TV.