Si de Fukushima les merdias ont parlé, ce n’est absolument pas le cas de ce qui se passe aux States en ce moment ...
Donc, après le Japon et Fukushima : Fort Calhoun et Los Alamos.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/28/us/28losalamos.html?_r=1
’’[...] Chief Tucker emphasized that the blaze — 44,000 acres had burned as of
Monday morning — was still entirely uncontained and highly
unpredictable. Smoke drifted through Santa Fe, which was preparing to
receive evacuated residents, and further north into Colorado. ’’
http://enenews.com/report-30000-drums-plutonium-contaminated-waste-stored-fabric-tents-above-ground-los-alamos-lab-comment
’’[...] The anti-nuclear watchdog group Concerned Citizens for Nuclear
Safety said the fire appeared to be about 3 1/2 miles from a dumpsite
where as many as 30,000 55-gallon drums of plutonium-contaminated waste
were stored in fabric tents above ground. ’’
http://enenews.com/river-water-now-surrounds-spent-fuel-pool-building-and-main-reactor-building-at-ft-calhoun-after-collapse-of-water-filled-dam
’’[...] Because of the collapsed water-filled dam, river water surrounds
the main reactor building, mechanical building, spent fuel pool building
and other structures. ’’
http://enenews.com/100-chance-reactor-core-damage-caused-flood-rising-above-1010-feet-ft-calhoun-nuke-plant-nrc-2010-river-around-1007-ft-expected-rise
’’[...] UCS cannot say that these NRC actions already prevented an accident at
Fort Calhoun or that they will prevent one should the flood waters
continue to rise. However, the NRC did its job last year. The NRC’s
inspectors found that Fort Calhoun was supposed to be protected against
floods rising to 1014 feet, but was not. The NRC’s risk analysts
determined that this deficiency was not academic — floods above 1010
feet had a 100 percent chance of core meltdown. ’’
Razzara