@Bernard Dugué
 Mais encore ? (et puis, vous n’argumentez pas cette proposition ...)

J’ai pu relever ceci dans un passage de la video (en essayant de transcrire en texte mot à mot tel quel, sans avoir la ponctuation ...) :

 .... actually I have 26 pages these the authors of those publications the people who can do it  who works with

them who are expert who in this

they calls some old technique no that is cla+ssic traditional

even this year that technique is published by dr difer in the university of minesota
to show how they swept that’s curvy to that part to sas
We cite that paper and those experts using their position to mice
to mislead people who trust them
(53:43) who cannot read the paper or who dont’t have enough time to understand this paper
and, as still as I mentionned :

* first _ I have the support from the real expert in the US gevernment
* and also I have feedback from other scientists and researchers who can understand this paper
* and the third thing is : like those people I listed in the report who I showed that
they can do it and they did it to come to argue with me 
    in a scientific way

* I mean welcome the life open debate

but don’t let people tell in journals use the similar comment as
oh this is not the academic institution

Just because I have to escape and I’m faced with my danger
and also drag to it to political

This is not political you guys make it political

this about global health about trees back to the pandemic’s reason
about how to solve it from the beginning 
It should never happen from the beginning

and also don’t just use the same word again and again said
all this is nonsense and this is hilarious
and use the nice mislead
Please I have this
so many many smoking guns don’t just drag little bit terms out

and use your eyes to chase people ....