Tableau de bord
| Rédaction | Depuis | Articles publiés | Commentaires postés | Commentaires reçus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L'inscription | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1 mois | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 jours | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Derniers commentaires
-
foi raisonnable ? William Lane Craig ? voila qui me surprend beaucoup. Voila un homme qui ecrit :
"Moreover, if we believe, as I do, that God’s grace is extended to those who die in infancy or as small children, the death of these children was actually their salvation. We are so wedded to an earthly, naturalistic perspective that we forget that those who die are happy to quit this earth for heaven’s incomparable joy. Therefore, God does these children no wrong in taking their lives.
So whom does God wrong in commanding the destruction of the Canaanites ? Not the Canaanite adults, for they were corrupt and deserving of judgement. Not the children, for they inherit eternal life. So who is wronged ? Ironically, I think the most difficult part of this whole debate is the apparent wrong done to the Israeli soldiers themselves. Can you imagine what it would be like to have to break into some house and kill a terrified woman and her children ? The brutalizing effect on these Israeli soldiers is disturbing."
Read more : http://www.reasonablefaith.org/slaughter-of-the-canaanites#ixzz26rAHUcsIvoila un homme qui pense que le plus grand probleme dans l’assassinat d’une femme et de ses enfants, est l’effet sur la sensibilite du tueur.
Personnellement, je pense que William Lane Craig est completement fou.
Agoravox utilise les technologies du logiciel libre : SPIP, Apache, Ubuntu, PHP, MySQL, CKEditor.
Site hébergé par la Fondation Agoravox
A propos / Contact / Mentions légales / Cookies et données personnelles / Charte de modération