Trop fort, les références du fasciste Péripate, toujours pour essayer de réécrire l’histoire ! lol !
Un livre écrit avec les pieds et les lunettes à l’envers d’un conservateur américain pur et dur ; voyons quelques critiques :
Austin W. Bramwell wrote in The American Conservative : "Not only does Goldberg misunderstand liberalism, but he refuses to see it simply as liberalism... Liberal Fascism
reads less like an extended argument than as a catalogue of
conservative intellectual clichés, often irrelevant to the supposed
point of the book."[17]
In The Nation, Eric Alterman wrote that Goldberg’s grouping of left-wing politics with fascism is based on weak, tenuous associations : "Some fascists were vegetarians ; some liberals are vegetarians ; ergo... Some fascists were gay ; some liberals are gay... Fascists cared about educating children ; Hillary Clinton
cares about educating children. Aha ! ... This is a book that argues
that Woodrow Wilson ’was the twentieth century’s first fascist
dictator’ and that it is ’impossible to deny that the New Deal was objectively fascistic.’« [18]
Finalement tout à fait proche des positions du Péripate ; on comprend ses références.
Sinon, il y a aussi un autrichien national socialiste (je le mets en gras, ça va te faire plaisir, péripate), qui a écrit un super bouquin qui s’appelle »Mein Kampf" : un must !
Salauds de pauvres !