Et voici :
CASE STUDY
The Intercept Of N47BA
On October 25 1999, about 12:13 central daylight time (CDT), a Learjet
Model 35, registration N47BA, operated by Sunjet Aviation, Inc., of
Sanford, Florida, crashed near Aberdeen, South Dakota. Onboard was
American golfer Payne Stewart along with three other passengers and two
pilots. This incident offers a valuable case study for considering the
performance of the air defense system on September 11 because it is the
only time in the ten years prior to the 9/11 attacks that the FAA
requested military intercept of a civilian aircraft over the continental
United States.
This event is of particular interest in relation to 9/11 because it has
previously been cited by proponents of an alternative explanation as
evidence that the US Air Defense System did not function as it was
designed to on 9/11. The reality is that close inspection of this
tragedy reveals just how unequipped the system was to deal with civil
airliners being used as weapons.
Those who bring up the intercept as an example of the system working as
it was designed to tend to emphasise those aspects that are common with
the 9/11 Attacks ; a civilian aircraft flying over domestic United States
airspace fails to respond to Air Traffic Controllers who then dispatch
fighter aircraft to intercept the unresponsive aircraft and determine
what the situation is.
However what makes this intercept so valuable is not the similarities,
but the differences. These can be divided into three broad categories ;
the opportunity for intercept, the ease of intercept, and the actual
operational nature of the intercept.
The opportunity for intercept is most fundamentally a function of time.
The more time is available, the greater the opportunity for intercept,
and the more likely a successful intercept is. In both the case of
N47BA and the four flights hijacked on 9/11, time was limited ;
eventually the LearJet would run out of fuel, and eventually the
hijackers would find their targets.
In the example of N47BA, the first failure to respond occurred at
0933EDT. The aircraft crashed at 1213CDT – a full three hours and forty
minutes later. In contrast, as we will see later American Airlines
Flight 11 was in the air for only 47 minutes, United Airlines was in the
air for 49 minutes, American Airlines Flight 77 was airborne for 77
minutes, and United Airlines Flight 93 was airborne for 81 minutes. Had
UA93 continued to its intended target in Washington DC it is estimated
it would have arrived between 10:10 and 10:20 EDT, resulting in a total
flying time of up to 98 minutes.
The opportunity for intercept is further reduced by considering when
each flight was actually hijacked, and even further by when Air Traffic
Controllers first suspected the aircraft had been hijacked. Taking
these factors into account the longest opportunity for intercept for any
of the flights on 9/11 was 33 minutes for AA11. The discrepancy
between the intercept of N47BA and the events of 9/11 becomes clear when
you consider that the combined flight time between first suspicion of
hijacking and impact for all four flights on 9/11 is shorter than the
flight time between loss of contact and impact for N47BA alone.
Another important aspect to consider is ease of intercept. The
circumstances of N47BA’s distress is detailed in the official National
Transport Safety Board (NTSB) Aircraft Accident Brief. On October 25,
1999 N47BA departed Orlando Fl. For Dallas Tx. At 0927EDT, Jacksonville
ARTCC instructed N47BA to climb and maintain a flight level of
39,000ft. This instruction was acknowledged by the pilot. At 09:33EDT
the aircraft was instructed to change frequencies and contact another
Jacksonville ARTCC controller. The aircraft did not respond to this
transmission, and failed to respond to the controller’s five attempts to
contact the flight over the next 4 ½ minutes.
The next incident in the NTSB report is the arrival of a USAF fighter
aircraft to within 8nm of N47BA at 09:52CDT. At 09:54CDT the lone
fighter approached to within 2,000ft and attempted to make radio
contact, and at 10:00CDT the fighter pilot began a visual inspection.
Between the last transmission from N47BA and initial intercept, 85
minutes elapsed. In this same space of time on 9/11 each of the four
flights departed from international airports, attained cruising
altitude, was hijacked, turned around, flown towards intended targets,
and crashed.
However this discrepancy alone does not tell the entire story. The
aircraft that initially intercepted N47BA was not an armed NORAD alert
fighter. It was an unarmed F-16 from the 40th Flight Test Squadron
based at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida. The aircraft was also already
in the air at the time, and happened to be in the vicinity. It is not
unusual for Air Traffic Controllers to use the pilots of nearby aircraft
as their “eyes” in the event of an incident with another flight. On
9/11 several military and civilian pilots were asked to look out for the
hijacked aircraft (including the pilots of UA175 who would, in an act
of tragic irony, themselves become victims of a hijacking only minutes
later), and at least two were diverted from their flight paths by ATC to
investigate.
As such the initial intercept of N47BA cannot be considered a scramble.
It was nothing more than the diversion of a locally available aircraft
that was capable of locating the LearJet and moving close enough to
inspect it. This intercept was requested directly by the mission
coordinator at Jacksonville ARTCC, and was not a formal request for
military assistance.
These aspects made the intercept easier from the perspective of the Air
Traffic Controller, however several other aspects made the intercept
easier from the perspective of the fighter pilot as well. N47BA was
flying at about 46,000ft in level flight on a Northwest heading. The
aircraft did not deviate in any way from this flight path from the
moment that communication was lost, other than to fluctuate in altitude.
N47BA also maintained an operational and correctly functioning
transponder at all times. As previously discussed the transponder
relays vital information to the FAA such as flight number, altitude,
airspeed and heading. The transponder is also of benefit to the fighter
pilot as all military combat aircraft are fitted with an Identification
Friend-or-Foe (IFF) interrogator which enables them to directly
interrogate the aircraft’s transponder (rather than relying on position
reports from the FAA).
As previously mentioned the F-16 that initially intercepted N47BA was
already airborne at the time and in the vicinity. This also made
intercept easier for the pilot as he was already at altitude and in
close proximity to the target aircraft.
The last aspect to consider is the operational nature of the intercept.
As I have already discussed, the protocol for requests for military
assistance to civilian authorities is strictly regimented by a series of
orders. While under immediate response conditions peaceful and
humanitarian efforts are permitted, this does not include the escort of
hijacked aircraft, which is addressed by its own regulations. Likewise
this does not include military assistance in a law enforcement capacity,
nor military assistance in the event of a major terrorist incident. In
both cases military assistance is strictly controlled in accordance
with US law.
In the case of N47BA there was no grounds for air traffic controllers to
consider the incident an aircraft hijacking or terrorist attack. It
was instead an airborne emergency. In contrast FAA controllers on 9/11
immediately suspected AA11 was a hijacking, and after the crashing of
UA175 they knew they were dealing with a major terrorist incident with
many other suspected hijackings underway.
The circumstances of the intercept of N47BA were therefore very
different from the circumstances on 9/11 and required a very different
process for responding. In numerous ways this earlier incident
facilitated a much easier interception. Despite this, had the intercept
procedure on 9/11 followed the sequence that occurred in the case of
the N47BA intercept, none of the hijacked aircraft would have been
successfully intercepted.
The lessons offered by the intercept of N47BA do not begin and end with
the successful intercept of the LearJet by a lone F-16, 85 minutes into
the emergency. According to media reports after the incident, at about
09:08CDT the FAA requested assistance, and two F-16s from the 148th
Fighter Wing at Tyndall Air Force Base in Florida were diverted to
intercept the Learjet. This was the first involvement of interceptors,
and it occurred 35 minutes after communication was lost. Had the FAA
delayed this long before requesting an intercept for the flights on
9/11, all four would have crashed before the request was even made.
These fighters from Tyndall failed to catch up with the Learjet.
Meanwhile at about 09:22CDT the FAA diverted the F-16 from Eglin,
accompanied by a Fairchild A-10 Thunderbolt II, to intercept the
Learjet. They reached within 8nm of the Learjet half an hour later, but
the slower A-10 fell behind so that the F-16 intercepted N47BA alone at
09:54CDT. The F-16 departed the Learjet at 10:12CDT as it was low on
fuel.
Another intercept request was not made until 10:59CDT, when four
Oklahoma Air National Guard F-16s on a training mission with a KC-135
tanker aircraft were directed to catch up with the Learjet. Like the
fighter from Eglin, these fighter aircraft were unarmed.
This request was followed at 11:03CDT by a scramble of two unarmed F-16s
from the North Dakota Air National Guard at Fargo. At 11:13CDT two of
the Oklahoma ANG F-16s made contact with the Learjet and inspected it.
At 11:15CDT the two Oklahoma fighters were joined by the North Dakota
ANG fighters. The Oklahoma ANG and North Dakota ANG fighters remained
in close proximity with the Learjet until it crashed 23 minutes later.
The Learjet spent 3 hours and 40 minutes flying uncontrolled and
unresponsive across US airspace, yet it was only escorted by fighters
for 1 hour and 18 minutes of this time. It took the FAA 35 minutes to
request military assistance, and when they did, a total of four
different flights of fighter aircraft were diverted or scrambled to
intercept the Learjet. The first failed to intercept, the second took
32 minutes to intercept, the third took 14 minutes to intercept, and the
intercept time for the last flight was 47 minutes. Of these four
flights, all but the last one were in the air at the time their
assistance was requested, and none were armed. One minute before the
aircraft crashed, and 3 hours and 39 minutes after contact with the
aircraft had been lost, two armed fighters at Fargo, North Dakota were
put on alert ; the first instance of armed aircraft being considered to
escort the Learjet.
According to numerous media reports at the time of the incident, the
Pentagon never considered shooting down the aircraft at the time of the
incident, and although a discussion began about an hour into the
incident over what to do if it appeared the aircraft would crash in a
heavily populated area, estimations of where the aircraft would run out
of fuel indicated it would be over a rural area.
The intercept of N47BA over the continental United States in 1999
provides us with vital information regarding the practical functioning
of the air defense system. Despite numerous incident-specific
characteristics which favoured a rapid and successful intercept in
comparison with the hijackings of 9/11, the outcome of that earlier
incident indicates that under similar circumstances any attempted
intercept on 9/11 would have failed. Once it is taken into account that
numerous aspects of the 9/11 events made a successful intercept
significantly more difficult, it is no surprise that none of the four
airliners were intercepted by the military
Voici la fiche wiki si ca vous interesse : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_South_Dakota_Learjet_crash
27/09 23:12 - charmord
Dans ta chronologie, tu oublies ceci qui date du 8 octobre 2001 : http://www.fromthewilderness.com/
24/09 19:36 - Romulus Augustule
Chronologie des débuts de la théorie du complot : 11 septembre 2001 : Des journalistes de (...)
24/09 15:09 - Jesse Darvas
Sur les squibs : http://www.debunking911.com/overp.htm Une caractéristique des truthers est de (...)
24/09 14:10 - Donald Forestier
24/09 14:04 - Julien
Je comprends qu’on puisse préférer la version officielle, mais au moins en gardant des (...)
24/09 07:28 - Jesse Darvas
« Vous me demandiez de vous donner le nom d’un ex-truther, en voici un : (...)
Agoravox utilise les technologies du logiciel libre : SPIP, Apache, Ubuntu, PHP, MySQL, CKEditor.
Site hébergé par la Fondation Agoravox
A propos / Contact / Mentions légales / Cookies et données personnelles / Charte de modération