Eh, Morice, vous lisez les liens que vous mettez en ligne ?
Allez, celui sur Mary WOODWARD :
« Fifty years later, I am proud of that piece of reporting. Intensive investigations have shown that I was a pretty accurate witness. I reported then and still believe without the slightest equivocation that :
The first shot missed completely.
There was a noticeable time lapse between the first and second shot.
The car slowed almost to a stop after the first shot.
The second shot hit the target but was possibly not fatal.
The third shot pierced the brain and was almost certainly fatal.
I wasn’t perfect, however, and I did make one misstatement that haunts me to this day. I wrote that the shots sounded as if they had “come from behind me and to my right,” the direction of the grassy knoll.
What I failed to take into account was a hearing disability that makes it impossible for me to accurately determine the direction of sound. (Just ask anyone who has been a passenger in my car when a siren goes off.) I have also been told by experts, including hearing specialists and marksmen, that the lay of the land in that area might have distorted the sound.
I tried to correct the misimpression, but it was too late. Conspiracy theorists used my words as “evidence.” I was labeled “the first dissenting witness.” Others claimed that my clarification was made under pressure by everyone from my bosses at the newspaper to Dallas city fathers to the FBI. »
Vous savez ce que ça veut dire ?
Je vous traduis ?
Votre témoin était en réalité incapable de dire d’où prevenaient les tirs mais les conspis ont utilisé son témoignage au profit de leur théorie, ce qu’elle regrette amèrement !