@Opposition contrôlée

 Comme dans toute étude il faudrait connaitre le protocole : fréquence, puissance, nombre d’expositions.
Alors moi je le redis pour la quatrième fois dans des conditions courantes d’utilisation les ondes radio ne sont pas dangereuses et plutôt que le résultat de telles recherches trouvez moi un travailleur exposé à ces ondes dans la vie courante et qui aurait eu à en subir des séquelles
Dans la vie de tous les jours si l’on respecte les normes pas de problème

Alors étude pour étude :
A large Danish cohort study (420,095 individuals) examined the risk of many forms of cancer among mobile phone subscribers (Schuz et al., 2006). The study found no excess risk of gliomas or other tumours in the follow-up period, which ended in 2002.The authors also investigated the risk of acoustic neuromas and found noevidence of an increased risk.Concerns have been raised regardingthe use of subscription information as a surrogate for use of cell phones, as was done in this study.

Mobile phone use and the risk of brain neoplasms were also examined in another large prospective study that included 791,710 UK women (Benson et al., 2013). Participants were asked twice about their mobile phone use (in a survey conducted between 1999 and 2005 and in another conducted in 2009) and cancer incidence was examined through 2009.Overall, no increased risk was observed among ever users for CNS tumours or other major cancer sites. Among long-term cell phone users (>10 years), there was no increase in risk for gliomas, but a large increased risk of acoustic neuroma.

Pettersson and colleagues (2014) very recently published a case-control study of acoustic neuromas in Sweden. The study included 451 cases and 710 controls that completed a mailed questionnaire. No excess was observed among mobile phone users overall,