Si de Fukushima les merdias ont parlé, ce n’est absolument pas le cas de ce qui se passe aux States en ce moment ...
Donc, après le Japon et Fukushima : Fort Calhoun et Los Alamos.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/28/us/28losalamos.html?_r=1
’’[...] Chief Tucker emphasized that the blaze — 44,000 acres had burned as of Monday morning — was still entirely uncontained and highly unpredictable. Smoke drifted through Santa Fe, which was preparing to receive evacuated residents, and further north into Colorado. ’’
’’[...] The anti-nuclear watchdog group Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety said the fire appeared to be about 3 1/2 miles from a dumpsite where as many as 30,000 55-gallon drums of plutonium-contaminated waste were stored in fabric tents above ground. ’’
’’[...] Because of the collapsed water-filled dam, river water surrounds the main reactor building, mechanical building, spent fuel pool building and other structures. ’’
’’[...] UCS cannot say that these NRC actions already prevented an accident at Fort Calhoun or that they will prevent one should the flood waters continue to rise. However, the NRC did its job last year. The NRC’s inspectors found that Fort Calhoun was supposed to be protected against floods rising to 1014 feet, but was not. The NRC’s risk analysts determined that this deficiency was not academic — floods above 1010 feet had a 100 percent chance of core meltdown. ’’
Razzara
Pour réagir, identifiez-vous avec votre login / mot de passe, en haut à droite de cette page
Si vous n'avez pas de login / mot de passe, vous devez vous inscrire ici.
Agoravox utilise les technologies du logiciel libre : SPIP, Apache, Ubuntu, PHP, MySQL, CKEditor.
Site hébergé par la Fondation Agoravox
A propos / Contact / Mentions légales / Cookies et données personnelles / Charte de modération